members

The question of whether correspondence among individuals serving on a homeowners association board enjoys a protected status is complex. The answer depends heavily on state law, the governing documents of the association (declaration, bylaws, rules and regulations), and the specific content of the communications. While board members have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the association, this does not automatically render all internal communications strictly private. For instance, a discussion regarding ongoing litigation strategy may be considered privileged, while general discussions about budget allocations may be subject to disclosure.

The classification of these communications as confidential carries significant weight regarding transparency and accountability within the community. Open communication fosters trust among homeowners and ensures informed participation in association matters. Conversely, restricting access to all internal board discussions could lead to perceptions of secrecy and potential mismanagement. Historically, open meeting laws, initially designed for governmental bodies, have influenced the trend towards increased transparency in community associations, though the specifics vary widely across jurisdictions.

Read more